Готов псевдокод, но не знаю, как реализовать. Разбивка текста на абзацы

Lorem ipsum dolor sit amet. 
!!!Nam non diam porttitor. Phasellus non quam ultrices tempus mi. Sed vel ex ex. 
Nulla ut maximus justo.
 !!!Vivamus luctus eget odio non pellentesque. Fusce vel diam sagittis.

English has been established as having a simpler and often more logical structure. Gestri et al. [2011], for example, contend that English is by nature a more synthetic language. 
!!!Burgess [2001], in his seminal work on the subject, disputed some of Gestri’s observations. 
!!!Smith and Jones [2010] compared English and Spanish technical writing and 
!!!found that English used about 30% less words to express the same concept. They confirmed previous research on the subject by concluding that English is inherently simpler and more concise. His findings were essentially the same as !!!Smith’s and Jones’, but deviated in the percentages – 40% rather than 30%. 
Ourworkis a direct continuation of the work begun by !!!Smith and Ughi, but with two essential differences

1)A review of the literature in this field clearly shows that the majority of authors believe that there is an inherent difference between English and Latinate languages: English has been established as having a simpler and often more logical structure. 2)Gestri et al. [2011], for example, contend that English is by nature a more synthetic language. 3)Burgess [2001], in his seminal work on the subject, disputed some of Gestri’s observations. 4)Specifically, Burgess called into question the latter’s GAS index, and eventually reformulated it into the SMOKEWARE index [2004]. 
5)Smith and Jones [2010] compared English and Spanish technical writing and found that English used about 30% less words to express the same concept. 6)They confirmed previous research on the subject by concluding that English is inherently simpler and more concise. 7)A similar study was made by Ughi [2014] who reported on an interesting statistical analysis of typical phrases in the two languages. 8)His findings were essentially the same as Smith’s and Jones’, but deviated in the percentages – 40% rather than 30%. 9)Our work is a direct continuation of the work begun by Smith and Ughi, but with two essential differences: 
10)(1) The works quoted above make the unwarranted assumption that English has always been a simple language. 
11)We attempt to prove otherwise. 
12)(2) We go a step further than previous works, in that we establish a correlation between the simplicity of a language and the ease of life in the nation where that language is spoken. 13)To prove these two points we developed a Verbosity Index, derived from 1000 recent scientific articles written in English, and the same number written in Italian (for full details see Sect. 4). 14)The Verbosity Index was computed on the basis of the difficulty in comprehending an article, primarily in terms of sentence length – the higher the VI, the more difficult the understanding. 15)The same process was then repeated for articles written 50 years ago. 16)The results show that the English of 50 years ago has a comparable Verbosity Index to current French, Italian and Spanish, but is much higher than current English.
 17)Our findings demonstrate that English has become increasingly less verbose over the last 20 years. 18)We believe that this trend can in part be attributed to such organizations as the Campaign for Plain English and Siegel and Gale (a company spe******ed in reducing the length and complexity of government documents). 19)A concerted effort has been made to make English simpler. 20)This has been done for two main reasons. 21)Firstly, to make the written language more accessible to a wider variety of people (but not primarily those whose first language is not English). 
22)Secondly, for economic reasons it makes much more sense to have a document of one page rather than three. 23)Not only is time saved in writing and reading the document, it also costs less to produce, and takes much less time to process, especially in the case of such documents as passport forms and tax declaration returns. 
24)We believe that our work has significant implications for all those countries whose citizens are habitually buried in bureaucratic procedures and forms.

1)A review of the literature in this field clearly shows that the majority of authors believe that there is an inherent difference between English and Latinate languages: English has been established as having a simpler and often more logical structure. 2)Gestri et al. [2011], for example, contend that English is by nature a more synthetic language. 3)Burgess [2001], in his seminal work on the subject, disputed some of Gestri’s observations. 4)Specifically, Burgess called into question the latter’s GAS index, and eventually reformulated it into the SMOKEWARE index [2004]. 
!!!5)Smith and Jones [2010] compared English and Spanish technical writing and found that English used about 30% less words to express the same concept. 6)They confirmed previous research on the subject by concluding that English is inherently simpler and more concise. 7)A similar study was made by Ughi [2014] who reported on an interesting statistical analysis of typical phrases in the two languages. 8)His findings were essentially the same as Smith’s and Jones’, but deviated in the percentages – 40% rather than 30%. 9)Our work is a direct continuation of the work begun by Smith and Ughi, but with two essential differences: 
!!!10)(1) The works quoted above make the unwarranted assumption that English has always been a simple language. 
!!!11)We attempt to prove otherwise. 
!!!12)(2) We go a step further than previous works, in that we establish a correlation between the simplicity of a language and the ease of life in the nation where that language is spoken. 13)To prove these two points we developed a Verbosity Index, derived from 1000 recent scientific articles written in English, and the same number written in Italian (for full details see Sect. 4). 14)The Verbosity Index was computed on the basis of the difficulty in comprehending an article, primarily in terms of sentence length – the higher the VI, the more difficult the understanding. 15)The same process was then repeated for articles written 50 years ago. 16)The results show that the English of 50 years ago has a comparable Verbosity Index to current French, Italian and Spanish, but is much higher than current English.
 !!!17)Our findings demonstrate that English has become increasingly less verbose over the last 20 years. 18)We believe that this trend can in part be attributed to such organizations as the Campaign for Plain English and Siegel and Gale (a company spe******ed in reducing the length and complexity of government documents). 19)A concerted effort has been made to make English simpler. 20)This has been done for two main reasons. 21)Firstly, to make the written language more accessible to a wider variety of people (but not primarily those whose first language is not English). 
!!!22)Secondly, for economic reasons it makes much more sense to have a document of one page rather than three. 23)Not only is time saved in writing and reading the document, it also costs less to produce, and takes much less time to process, especially in the case of such documents as passport forms and tax declaration returns. 
!!!24)We believe that our work has significant implications for all those countries whose citizens are habitually buried in bureaucratic procedures and forms.