Поиск ближайшего полигона

>>> how to calculate the “Signed Distance Function" for a polygonal object
<think>
Okay, so I need to figure out how to calculate the Signed Distance Function (SDF) for a polygonal object. Hmm, where do I
start? I remember SDF is related to distance fields, which are used in graphics and computational geometry. Let me try to
recall.

From what I know, an SDF is typically defined as the distance from a point to the closest feature of an object. For convex
shapes like spheres or boxes, it's straightforward because you can compute the closest point efficiently using projection along
normals. But polygonal objects are trickier because they have flat faces and edges, which means more complex interactions.

I think the SDF for a polygon is built by considering each face, edge, and vertex of the polygon and determining how close a
point can get to each of these features. For convex polygons, you might be able to compute this by looking at each face
separately because each face contributes a certain part of the distance function.

Wait, but polygons can have concavities too. So maybe I need to handle each face individually and then merge their
contributions? Or perhaps there's another approach where I use the polygon's geometry to construct an implicit surface?

Let me think about how implicit functions work. An SDF is a type of implicit function that outputs a signed distance, which can
be positive (outside), negative (inside), or zero (on the surface). For a polygonal object, I suppose it would be constructed
by combining the distances from each face, edges, and vertices.

So, perhaps for each face, edge, and vertex, I compute their individual contributions to the SDF. But how exactly?

I recall that for convex polyhedra, like boxes, you can compute the SDF by considering each face's distance contribution using
projection along the face's normal. For non-convex shapes, it gets more complicated because points inside a face might not
contribute in the same way.

Wait, maybe I should break down the problem into steps:

1. **Triangulate the Polygon**: Since the object is polygonal, it can be triangulated into triangles. Each triangle can be
treated as a convex shape, making it easier to compute SDF contributions from each face.

2. **Compute Distance Contributions for Faces**: For each triangular face, compute how close a point is to that face. The
distance contribution would be based on the projection along the face's normal. But since faces are triangles, this might not
account for edges or vertices properly.

3. **Consider Edges and Vertices**: Each edge and vertex can also contribute to the SDF by creating local features. For
example, near an edge, the distance function could have a sharp change or a notch, which would require their own contributions.

4. **Combine All Contributions**: Merge all these individual contributions into a single SDF that considers the proximity to
faces, edges, and vertices together.

But I'm not sure if this approach is correct. Maybe there's a more efficient way. I remember something about using polygonal
Marching Cubes or similar methods for implicit surfaces. However, those might be more suitable for voxel grids rather than
point queries.

Alternatively, perhaps the SDF can be constructed by considering each face, edge, and vertex as separate geometric entities and
their influence on the distance field.

Wait, here's another thought: The SDF of a polygon can be seen as an extension of the SDF for a convex polyhedron. Since each
face is flat, maybe I can compute the distance to the closest point on that face and then aggregate all these distances.

But how do you combine multiple distances from different faces? Because the closest feature might not always be the closest
face; it could also be an edge or vertex near another face.

Hmm, perhaps for each face, edge, and vertex, I need to compute a distance function and then take the minimum of all those
contributions. But that sounds computationally intensive, especially for complex polygons with many faces.

Wait, maybe I can use a hybrid approach where I first project onto each face, calculate their distances, and then handle edges
and vertices as additional constraints. Or perhaps using some kind of sweep line algorithm to build up the SDF by handling each
feature in order of proximity.

I'm getting a bit stuck here. Let me try to outline the steps more clearly:

1. **Triangulate the Polygon**: If the polygon isn't already triangulated, I'll need to do that first. This will allow me to
handle each face as a triangle.

2. **Compute Face Contributions**: For each triangular face, compute the distance from a query point to this face using
projection along the face's normal. This gives a signed distance for each face.

3. **Compute Edge Contributions**: Edges can be thought of as lines where two faces meet. The closest point on an edge could be
the projection onto the edge's direction or some combination of the adjacent faces' distances.

4. **Compute Vertex Contributions**: Vertices are points, so their contribution would be zero for distance but might affect the
SDF by creating sharp features.

5. **Merge All Contributions**: Combine all these individual contributions to create a final SDF that accurately represents the
proximity to the entire polygonal object.

But I'm not sure how exactly to compute edge and vertex contributions without overcounting or missing some regions. Maybe
there's a smarter way using computational geometry libraries or existing algorithms.

Wait, perhaps using the convex hull of the polygon could simplify things? If the polygon is non-convex but has a known convex
hull, maybe I can handle each face within the convex hull and then adjust for any concave parts.

Alternatively, maybe the SDF for a polygonal object can be built by considering each face separately and integrating their
contributions, similar to how you build level sets for implicit surfaces. But this might not capture the edges and vertices
correctly.

I think I need to look into existing algorithms or methods that compute SDFs for polygons. From what I remember, Marching Cubes
is a standard method but is typically used for grid-based computations, not point queries. So perhaps it's not applicable here.

Another approach could be using polygonal distance fields built on triangle meshes. I believe there are techniques where you
can construct an SDF by considering each face and then combining their contributions while ensuring consistency across the
entire mesh.

Wait, here's a different angle: The SDF can be computed as the minimum of the distances to all faces, edges, and vertices. So
for any point in space, the closest feature (face, edge, or vertex) determines the signed distance.

To compute this efficiently, one could:

- Precompute normals for each face.
- For a given query point, project onto each face and calculate the signed distance.
- Similarly, check proximity to edges and vertices by projecting along edge directions or directly calculating their distances.

But again, with many faces, edges, and vertices, this becomes computationally expensive unless optimized properly.

Wait, perhaps using a spatial hierarchy or some form of culling can help reduce the number of computations. For example,
organizing the polygonal object into levels based on proximity, starting from the farthest features to the closest ones.

Alternatively, for each face, edge, and vertex, precompute their influence regions and combine them using some merging
technique.

But I'm still not sure about the exact steps or how to implement this without detailed knowledge of specific algorithms. Maybe
I need to refer back to basics.

In 3D graphics, computing distance functions often involves implicit surfaces like the SDF. For convex shapes, it's manageable
because each face contributes a simple portion. But for concave and polygonal objects, you have to account for each face, edge,
and vertex.

I think the approach is:

1. **Define Each Feature**: Identify all faces, edges, and vertices of the polygon.

2. **Compute Distance for Each Feature**: For each feature (face, edge, vertex), compute how close a given point is to that
feature.

3. **Combine Distances**: Determine which feature is closest for a given query point and assign the corresponding signed
distance.

But practically, this requires an efficient way to evaluate all features without excessive computation.

Perhaps using spatial partitioning or quadtrees to group nearby features together and compute their contributions more
efficiently.

Wait, maybe a better approach is inspired by the SDF for a convex polyhedron. For each face of the polygon (considering it as
part of a convex hull), compute its distance contribution and then merge these contributions while handling concave parts
separately.

But I'm not entirely certain about this. Maybe I should look at how SDFs are computed for triangle meshes in computational
geometry literature.

Upon some reflection, I recall that for implicit surfaces defined by polygonal data, one can use a method similar to the
Marching Cubes but adapted for point queries. Alternatively, the SDF can be built as an aggregate of all face contributions,
treating each face's distance function and then combining them while maintaining consistency across the entire object.

Another thought is that if the polygon is convex, computing its SDF is more straightforward because you can handle each face
independently without worrying about edge cases where multiple faces might influence the same region. But for non-convex
polygons, this approach alone isn't sufficient, so additional steps are needed to account for concave regions and edges.

I think the key takeaway is that calculating an SDF for a polygonal object involves considering each face, edge, and vertex's
contribution and combining them in a way that accurately reflects their proximity. It requires both geometric computations and
efficient algorithms to handle all these contributions without excessive computational load.
</think>

To calculate the Signed Distance Function (SDF) for a polygonal object, follow these steps:

1. **Triangulate the Polygon**: Convert the polygon into a set of triangles. This allows each face to be treated as a convex
triangular shape.

2. **Compute Face Contributions**:
- For each triangle face, compute the distance from a query point to this face using projection along the face's normal
vector.
- This distance is signed, indicating whether the point is inside or outside relative to the face's orientation.

3. **Identify Edges and Vertices**: Each edge and vertex of the polygon contributes to the overall SDF by creating sharp
features and local regions where the distance function can change behavior.

4. **Combine Face Contributions**: Merge the signed distances from all faces into a single distance map, ensuring that the
closest face is correctly identified for each point in space.

5. **Consider Edges and Vertices**: For edges, compute their influence by projecting along edge directions or using adjacent
face normals to determine proximity. For vertices, calculate direct distance as points can create discontinuities in the SDF.

6. **Efficient Evaluation**: Implement spatial partitioning techniques or hierarchies to efficiently evaluate contributions
from all faces, edges, and vertices without excessive computation. This can include culling distant features or using quadtrees
for organized access.

7. **Final SDF Construction**: For a given query point, determine the closest feature (face, edge, or vertex) by evaluating all
computed distances and assign the corresponding signed distance from that feature.

By following these steps, you can construct an SDF for a polygonal object that accurately represents its geometry in terms of
proximity. This approach combines geometric computations with efficient algorithms to handle the complexity introduced by
concave regions and polygonal edges.

>>> Send a message (/? for help)